Member

As many in this House will be aware, there is an existing process for designating protected sites, based on scientific evidence and the advice of Natural England, which ensures that waterways that need protection will receive it. We believe that the question of the designation of sites is best considered through this existing process, with input from relevant experts on the basis of the relevant need of a given site. So, although I recognise the intention behind this amendment, I hope the noble Lord will agree that the designation of sites sits outside the scope of Part 3 and that he feels able not to press his amendment.