Member

I turn to the risk of creating inconsistencies in the application of the legislation—I am thinking, for example, of Amendments 334 to 337 in the names of my noble friend Lord Lucas and the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, and Amendments 372 to 374 and Amendment 392 in the name of my noble friend Lord Wei. While I understand that the majority of the amendments in this group are probing amendments, I hope the Minister can reassure noble Lords who have tabled them that they are not necessary. I would be interested in whether she agrees with me that they could potentially create a different risk. On these Benches, we believe that Clauses 32 and 35 should stand part of the Bill.