Member

I am intrigued by the Minister’s argument that Section 29 should be retained in order that the NRM can be examined—I think that is what he said; it is what I wrote down, but I will have a look in Hansard— because I do not understand how it is necessary to keep the section on the statute book in order to examine the NRM. However, examination of the NRM may be a matter for another day. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.