Lord Empey (UUP)

My Lords, I want to deal with probing Amendments 887A and 888A, in my name. Throughout the process there has been a potential clash between what decisions might be made here and what decisions might be made in the devolved nations. In the other place, an amendment was introduced by the sponsor of the Bill as it progressed to extend certain parts of it to Northern Ireland and Scotland, as well as England and Wales. My colleagues at the other end tried to put an amendment down to probe why this was done. Unfortunately, it was not taken, so the matter was never really debated. I remind the House that Clause 37 deals with the regulation of approved substances and devices for self-administration. It says that: “The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision about approved substances”, and that has the extent of the entire United Kingdom. These regulations also deal with “the supply or offer for supply, or administration, of approved substances … the transportation, storage, handling and disposal of approved substances”, and “keeping records”. It says provisions must be made “about the manufacture, importation, preparation or assembly of approved substances … or in connection with the monitoring of matters” and so on, “requiring persons specified in the regulations, in specified cases, to give information to the Secretary of State”. As things stand at the moment, there is no plan by the Northern Ireland Executive to introduce an assisted dying Bill, and there is no Private Member’s Bill currently in the Chamber. Some of these regulations would, in my view, cut across the role that is currently played by devolved Ministers and devolved departments. This is what I am trying to get at and to probe. It does not, incidentally, confine the extent to Clause 37. In fact, other clauses extend the Bill’s extent as well—Clauses 43, 54, and 56 all apply to the whole of the United Kingdom. I do not understand that. If the noble and learned Lord could enlighten us, that would be most helpful. As I said, they are probing amendments. The point I am trying to tease out in Committee is why that was introduced if it was not in the original Bill and why that extension was made, because, as things stand, there are no plans for an assisted dying Bill in Northern Ireland—not from the Executive and there is no Private Member’s Bill currently. I totally accept that this Parliament has the right to legislate for the entire United Kingdom, irrespective of devolution. But, at the end of the day, the Bill says: “The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision about approved substances”. There is no argument about it—this has to happen. The extent of those regulations would be the entire United Kingdom. Whether Northern Ireland and Scotland want it, it is going to happen, according to this clause. Why is that the case? If there is no assisted dying available—and in many cases, it would be a devolved matter anyway—why are we regulating for the provision of these substances in all parts of the United Kingdom? That is what I want to know, and I will be grateful for the noble and learned Lord’s contribution in the wind-up.