Member

I turn finally to Amendments 229 and 230, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Best. Amendment 229 would remove the requirement for the database operator to allocate a unique identifier to each dwelling registered on the database. This would then enable the database to use unique property reference numbers as a method for identifying property. Amendment 230 would require the database operator to allocate a unique identifier for each property, which would then become the unique property reference number, or UPRN—an acronym that I must admit is new to me as well. I want to assure noble Lords that we really do recognise the value of UPRNs and intend to use them. We are investigating how they can best be integrated within the operation of the database.