Member

The Explanatory Notes provide an example of a shift given to a worker in less than the specified timeframe possibly being reasonable—namely, when another worker calls in sick and cover is required at very short notice. However, if a worker was asked on the day to work a shift to cover parental leave, for example, when the employer knew this would be required months in advance, we think this would likely be considered unreasonable. This Government are committed to engaging with all stakeholders on details such as this. If the noble Lord is concerned about clarity for workers and employers, I reassure him that there is more detail to come in regulations and further guidance. I also note that, if this amendment were accepted as drafted, it would not achieve its aims. It appears the noble Lord was using an old copy of the Bill when drafting his amendment, as the section references are not quite right.