Member

Furthermore, we are concerned that the amendment is likely to be narrowly interpreted, setting a very high bar that local authorities and integrated care boards might find it difficult to comply with. I know that noble Lords understand the importance of legislation working for the effect that it should have. For example, there could be circumstances where an individual experiences a mental health crisis and detention for assessment or treatment is necessary, despite the right community services being in place. Such circumstances would, of course, be out of the control of the integrated care board or the local authority but they would nevertheless be held responsible. It is our policy intention that the Bill should place a general duty on these bodies to pay particular attention to the needs of people with a learning disability and of autistic people when exercising their functions. We believe the current drafting of the Bill achieves this.