Darren Jones

The right hon. Gentleman should listen to my speech. I have just said that Catherine Little, Sir Chris Wormald and Sir Olly Robbins all agree on the point that due process was followed. When the Prime Minister received new information about the UKSV process this month, he immediately asked for the full facts to be established and he then come to this House on 20 April. On the statement that Peter Mandelson’s appointment was “subject to developed vetting”, the Prime Minister has always been clear that this appointment was in line with the processes at the time. I understand that there have been some questions about this process, but to be clear, as Sir Olly Robbins told the Foreign Affairs Committee in November: “As is normally the case with external appointments to my Department…the appointment was made subject to obtaining security clearance.” As Sir Chris Wormald told the same Committee: “The normal thing is for the security clearance to happen after appointment but before the person signs a contract and takes up post.” And as the former Cabinet Secretary said in his letter to the Prime Minister, having conducted a review into the process, “the vetting process was complete before the previous HMA Washington took up post on 10 February 2025, and it is more usual for security vetting to happen after appointment.”