Member

When one looks at all of that, one really says: are there any circumstances where this change could enable the CPS to reinstitute proceedings? I think that in response to a complaint or MP correspondence or following an inquest, one can reinstitute proceedings. This change would enable the CPS to reopen cases when further evidence comes to light that tips the code test in favour of a realistic prospect of conviction. It is currently largely prohibited from doing this under the double jeopardy rules, which allow the reinstitution of proceedings only in very strict circumstances.