L

Lord Berkeley (Lab)

Speaking in the House of Lords on 12 October 2026

Debate

Railways Bill

Contribution

My Lords, I find some of the comments by the noble Baroness very interesting, but to try to legislate to balance the needs for safety and anything else means that we have to put a value on safety. Taken to its logical conclusion, that means that the safest railway in the world is one on which no trains run. That may be fine for people who want to be 100% safe—if they are going to walk the track and not get run over by a train, so be it—but there has to be a balance. Then it all comes down to cost. I just cannot see how you can have a railway where safety comes first on everything because it will mean that there will be no trains running. If you go down on the Underground in London and stand on the platform, you are very safe—until somebody tries to push you—if there are no trains there. If a train comes, you get on it and you hope that you are safe. I just do not understand the benefits of this because the logical consequence is that there will be no trains.

More from Lord Berkeley (Lab)

Other recent Hansard contributions by the same speaker.

About Hansard

Hansard is the official verbatim record of proceedings in the UK Parliament. Every word spoken in the Commons and Lords is recorded and published — this page is a single contribution from that record.