Lord Moylan (Con)

My Lords, I will leave the matter now. Clearly, nothing prevents it from engaging—that is taken for granted—but the question is whether it should be obliged or under some sort of duty to implement its

Did I hear the noble Baroness respond to Amendment 289 or did she mean by silence to accept it? It concerned the Rail Safety and Standards Board.

My Lords, this has been an important debate. I start on a slightly philosophical note in trying to reconcile the opposing views of the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb, and the noble Lord, Lo

My Lords, I will be brief, so the Minister must not relax too much before he comes to respond. As before, the noble Baroness, Lady Grey-Thompson, has, both on her own behalf and on behalf of my noble

I am sorry to be pernickety about this, but I feel that the Minister ought to have answered my amendment, however nerdish it is. He told us what Clause 18(1) says, but he did not answer my point about

My Lords, it is disingenuous for the Minister to say that. Whatever criticism he may level at that Government for trying in a post-Covid environment to implement the Williams review and not implementi