Member

I am supportive of the intention behind Amendment 454B to encourage liaising between forces in order to prevent extremism. As has been outlined, extremism exists and is growing in all parts of the country. It is not an issue that can simply be addressed locally with a view that is sufficient. Counterextremism requires a co-ordinated, centralised directive that addresses the flow of people, ideas and resources between local forces. That being said, I am perhaps a little hesitant to fully endorse my noble friend’s amendment. The Government must do more, but I do not believe that creating a new counterextremism commissioner is the best use of resources. Nor am I of the opinion that government should be concerning itself with the practices of integration or cohesion. However, I support the general aim of my noble friend’s group, which is to take a more proactive approach to tackling the non-violent extremism that is so often the ferment of violence. I very much look forward to the Government’s response.