Member

I will say a few words about my Amendment 454. It is a very short, simple and, I suggest, uncontroversial amendment that suggests that when organisations are to be proscribed—with all the consequences that may flow from that, not just for the members of that organisation but for the people who go on protests and hold up Private Eye, or whatever it is—they should be proscribed one at a time. Each order, signed by the Home Secretary and laid before both Houses of Parliament for one up-and-down, yes-or-no vote with no amendment possible—we know our parliamentary procedure—should address one organisation.