M
Member
Speaking in the House of Lords on 21 January 2026
Debate
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools BillContribution
The need for decisive action is beyond doubt, but action alone is not enough. We have a responsibility to ensure that what we put in place is effective and future- proof. That is why I have tabled Amendment 108. Rather than a blanket ban, we propose a risk-based model that considers the risk of platforms according to the actual harm that they pose. Think of how we approach film classification or toy safety: we do not ban all films for children, rather we rate them; we do not ban all toys, rather we accept the risks. This amendment applies the same principle to online platforms. Under our proposals, providers must submit a proposed minimum age of access as part of the children’s risk assessment, with a default expectation of 16 years for social media services—a ban by another name—because enough is enough. We must take action and put a line in the sand.
About Hansard
Hansard is the official verbatim record of proceedings in the UK Parliament. Every word spoken in the Commons and Lords is recorded and published — this page is a single contribution from that record.
Partner sites