Member

I am not suggesting something specific for them in the Bill. My noble friend Lady Noakes in her Amendment 42 has, as always, a classically pure position, which is that it is not for any of us to tell anyone how their money should be spent. But I would be grateful if the Minister, in her winding up, could clarify the position of these people and, if there is to be any consideration of their interests, where that should fall. They are not members of the scheme, so I assume that it would not be a role of the trustees to think of the interests of people who are not members of the scheme; they are also employees of the same company.