TRUSTPOLITICS
James Naish

James Naish

Labour — Rushcliffe

Speaking in the House of Commons on 13 January 2026

Debate

Universities: Statutory Duty of Care

Contribution

Yes. Undoubtedly one of the universities’ biggest concerns is about how the duty would be implemented and what the implications would be. I am not shying away from the reality that there would be costs for universities, but the question is whether we should put the duty in place. My hon. Friend’s point is about how any such legislation should be implemented, as opposed to whether it is needed in the first place. It is important to be clear that a statutory duty of care is not about exposing institutions to unreasonable liability. In fact, clearer statutory duties may benefit universities by reducing uncertainty, helping to focus limited resources on the services and support that will make the biggest and most important legal difference, and by providing a shared sector-wide benchmark against which wellbeing and safety interventions can be properly assessed and, when necessary, judged in a court of law.
← Previous speaker
In this debate
Next speaker →
In this debate

More from James Naish

Other recent Hansard contributions by the same speaker.

View James Naish's full report card →

About Hansard

Hansard is the official verbatim record of proceedings in the UK Parliament. Every word spoken in the Commons and Lords is recorded and published — this page is a single contribution from that record.

For James Naish's full parliamentary record including voting history, expenses and all other contributions, see the James Naish report card.

Partner sites