Member

Persistent offending demands a persistent response. A curfew can provide stability and reduce opportunities for offending. An exclusion order can prevent an offender returning to the very location where they have repeatedly caused harm. Electronic monitoring can give both authorities and the community greater reassurance that restrictions are being observed. Crucially, judicial discretion is preserved. If there are exceptional circumstances relating to the offence or to the offender that make such a requirement inappropriate, the court may depart from the presumption. Likewise, where electronic monitoring cannot lawfully or practically be imposed, the requirement falls away. The amendment is therefore both firm and flexible. It sets a clear expectation without creating an inflexible straitjacket.