Member

In conclusion, my amendment does not dictate the answer. Rather, it merely provokes the Government into examining both options before deciding that one is unquestionably superior. These three amendments share a single purpose: to ensure that Parliament does not repeat the mistakes of the past. In the 1960s and 1970s, decisions were made about the Chagos Islands without consulting the people. The result was displacement, injustice and a lingering sense of betrayal. Today, as we consider transferring sovereignty, we have the opportunity to prevent a repeat of this injustice. Representation for this Chagossian community is of vital importance and they have once again been excluded from the negotiating table. I repeat what I said at the start of this speech: I refuse to cede my unwavering support for these people in their quest for representation, self-determination and respect.