Matt Rodda

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Dowd. I commend and thank my hon. Friend the Member for Mansfield (Steve Yemm) for securing this important debate. Reading constituents are concerned about this issue. We are lucky to live in a beautiful Victorian town, but sadly many historical streets and local communities are blighted by HMOs. I support more housing, but HMOs are not necessarily the most effective way to provide it. Issues include antisocial behaviour, bins overflowing and parking problems on very narrow Victorian streets. I have heard dreadful reports of noise from student parties linked to HMOs. The noise often carries, particularly in the summer when windows are open at night, and it can cause disruption to many residents over a wide area. I support and commend Reading borough council for introducing article 4 directions. I should declare an interest: I was a councillor in Reading, and I was consulted on implementing HMO article 4 directions. Might it be possible for the Minister to look again at the process for implementing the directives and the way that they work in practice? My experience is that they can be very helpful—councils are often brave to take on HMOs, and I thank Reading borough council for its work on them—but there is still the possibility of HMOs being created within an article 4 direction area. Is it possible to tighten up the article 4 regime to make it even harder for HMOs to operate in such areas? I appreciate that there is a need for them in certain parts of towns, but the clustering effect, particularly on certain streets where there are serious parking and bin issues, among other issues, can be overwhelming for residents. As my hon. Friend the Member for Mansfield quite rightly said, HMOs can change the nature of a settled community. Residents often know all their neighbours by their first name and have wonderful relationships on a street, and to have transient residents can cause real challenges.