Member

If the court is called upon to make a judgement, it must confine itself to an interpretation of the wording of the EU legislature of the Council of Ministers in the European Parliament. How could it possibly reach the conclusion that—when the legislature determined that all states should ban the use of amalgam from 1 January 2025, with a derogation until June 2026—the words affecting this requirement also mean that amalgam fillings can continue to be used generally in Northern Ireland until December 2034, when those words actually say no such thing?