Court Backlog
Tuesday, 10 November 2026
Contributions
Luke Myer (Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland) (Lab)Labour
5. What steps his Department is taking to reduce the court backlog.
The Minister for Courts and Legal Services (Sarah Sackman)Labour
The Crown court backlog stands at nearly 81,000 cases, with victims facing intolerable delays for justice. The Government are gripping this crisis in three ways: through record investment, which is lifting the financial limit on sitting days; through modernisation, including through the use of technology in our courts, for example, for virtual remand hearings; and, of course, through our Courts and Tribunals Bill, which will ease pressure on the Crown courts by ensuring proportionate allocation of resource, and redressing the balance between victims and defendants in our criminal justice system.
The number of cases at the Teesside combined court centre has more than doubled over the last decade, and organisations supporting victims of violence against women and girls tell me that they are concerned about the length of time it takes to get justice. What steps will the Government take to address that, and will they ensure that the rape and sexual abuse support fund remains ringfenced for organisations that provide legal support to those victims and survivors?
I thank my hon. Friend for his important question, which is a reminder that behind those 81,000 cases are real victims waiting for justice. That is why our investment of over half a billion pounds in victim support services is so important. There are also changes in procedures, such as ending the practice of floating trials for rape victims, so that they have certainty about when their trial will go ahead.
Manuela Perteghella (Stratford-on-Avon) (LD)Liberal Democrat
Does the Minister recognise the devastating impact of delays in serious sexual abuse cases? One such case, which was brought to my attention, took so long to reach trial that the defendant’s health deteriorated and they were ultimately found not fit to stand trial, denying the victim the opportunity to see justice done. Will the Minister consider prioritising cases where there is a risk that delays can prevent a trial from ever taking place?
The hon. Lady eloquently describes the devastating human impact of those delays. Our judiciary looks to prioritise cases where there are circumstances such as the one she describes. That is exactly why we need to bring forward the reforms in the Courts and Tribunals Bill to end these unacceptable and intolerable delays.
Jessica Morden (Newport East) (Lab)Labour
Can the Minister reassure my constituents, who are in their 90s and are the victims of an alleged large fraud, that the lengthy delays they have experienced so far are being addressed urgently so that they can finally see justice done, particularly in view of their age?
Once again, my hon. Friend makes the case through the particularly compelling example of elderly victims of crime awaiting justice. When we say that justice delayed is justice denied, that is exactly what we mean. It is why we must pull every lever in investment, legal aid and sitting days, modernisation through the adoption of technology, and, of course, the reforms in the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
Alison Bennett (Mid Sussex) (LD)Liberal Democrat
In 2011, there were 230 firms and 781 accredited legal representatives undertaking mental health legal aid work. There are now only 148 firms and 383 representatives. The rate of pay for mental health lawyers has, accounting for inflation, gone down by 47% since 2008. Our criminal courts are full of people with mental health disorders, so a functioning mental health system must be part of the mission to tackle the courts backlog. Does the Minister agree that legal aid fees for mental health law work must increase to ensure that patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 have access to competent, publicly funded legal representation?
I was very pleased to meet the hon. Lady and the heads of the Mental Health Lawyers Association, when we were able to discuss these issues. It is why, as a matter of priority when the Government came in, we invested in increases in fees for legal aid, criminal solicitors, prison lawyers and a forthcoming increase in fees for criminal barristers. But I accept that there is more work to do on the civil side, including in mental health. There are changes we can make through the transformation of the legal aid system and we are making that investment too, so that those providers are working within improved systems and not on the old legacy systems that have so hampered the delivery of access to justice.
Mr SpeakerSpeaker
I call the shadow Minister.
Sarah Bool (South Northamptonshire) (Con)Conservative
Employment tribunal backlogs have reached record levels, with more than 70,000 open single claims and some hearings outside of London delayed until 2029. The Employment Lawyers Association estimates that the phased introduction of the Employment Rights Act 2025 over the course of the next year will increase the tribunal caseload by up to a third. Does the Minister accept the concerns of the legal sector that extending employment rights without the ability to enforce, due to court backlogs, is meaningless and making access to justice in these life-changing disputes a postcode lottery?
I am proud of the work the Labour Government have done in introducing a once-in-a-generation piece of legislation increasing workers’ rights, but we must ensure that those rights are capable of enforcement. The backlogs in the employment tribunal are ones that I recognise, which is why reform will be necessary and why we are increasing capacity with additional judicial recruitment. We are also seeing additional challenges through the pressures that AI is bringing. Our response needs to be up to the task by ensuring that we introduce our own uses of responsible AI to meet that challenge.
Source: UK Parliament Hansard API. Debate ID: 5434234.