Hansard·Commons Chamber·Vol. 791

High North: British Interests

Monday, 19 October 2026

9 contributions5 members

Contributions

  1. Patricia Ferguson (Glasgow West) (Lab)Labour

    11. What steps he is taking to protect British interests in the High North.

    View contribution permalink →

  2. The Minister for the Armed Forces (Louise Sandher-Jones)Labour

    The UK is stepping up its defence of the High North. This year, our carrier strike group operated in the region, alongside 19 NATO allies, and 1,500 of our Royal Marines have trained in Arctic conditions. We are also doubling our military presence in Norway, investing in key anti-submarine warfare and undersea surveillance capabilities, and our carrier strike group will be returning shortly to NATO’s northern flank.

    View contribution permalink →

  3. Patricia FergusonLabour

    The North Atlantic, High North and Baltic are the frontline of the UK’s security, which is why British leadership of the joint expeditionary force is so vital to our defence. Will the Minister update the House on the recent meetings of the joint expeditionary force counterparts in Iceland, and on the major exercises that have taken place across the region?

    View contribution permalink →

  4. Louise Sandher-JonesLabour

    We are rightly proud of the work that we are doing with partner nations in the JEF. In July this year, the carrier strike group deployed to the High North, working alongside 19 NATO allies, and is due back this autumn. The UK has recently taken command of NATO’s Joint Force Command Norfolk, which oversees all NATO operations across the High North, and the Royal Marines took part in Exercise Cold Response, alongside approximately 25,000 personnel from 14 allied nations.

    View contribution permalink →

  5. Dr Al Pinkerton (Surrey Heath) (LD)Liberal Democrat

    Last weekend I was in Iceland for the Arctic Circle Assembly, where I heard a great deal of support for greater co-operation with the United Kingdom in the High North, but also an excitement about the impending Arctic policy framework that was published on Thursday. That document recognised the great strategic importance of the High North to the United Kingdom. Given that, will the Minister say more about when a new icebreaker will be brought online, which is clearly critical to our polar strategy and posture? What other resources will the United Kingdom need in the short term to deliver that strategy?

    View contribution permalink →

  6. Louise Sandher-JonesLabour

    The hon. Gentleman is right to highlight the importance of our icebreaking capability. Project Shackleton is looking at the longer-term options for the capability.

    View contribution permalink →

  7. Mr SpeakerSpeaker

    I call the shadow Minister.

    View contribution permalink →

  8. David Reed (Exmouth and Exeter East) (Con)Conservative

    I was pleased to see the Defence Readiness and Industry Minister welcoming HMS Protector home to Devonport, although judging by the three tugboats, I suspect she was rather less enthusiastic about the reunion than he was. With growing Russian activity in the High North and renewed chest beating from Argentina over the Falklands, Britain’s only naval ice patrol ship faces an uncertain future. How can a single replacement sustain a credible presence at both poles, while allowing for maintenance and refits, and how will the Minister prevent a gap in capability?

    View contribution permalink →

  9. Louise Sandher-JonesLabour

    We have recently launched Project Shackleton, which is looking at some of the very questions that the hon. Gentleman raises. It is a very important capability, and we will look at the options to ensure we are mitigating the risks that we know we all face.

    View contribution permalink →

Source: UK Parliament Hansard API. Debate ID: 5419477.