Hansard·Commons Chamber·Vol. 790

Unregulated Child Contact Centres: Risks

Tuesday, 15 September 2026

4 contributions2 members

Contributions

  1. Alison Hume (Scarborough and Whitby) (Lab)Labour

    12. What assessment he has made of the risks to children and families from the use of unregulated child contact centres.

    View contribution permalink →

  2. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Jake Richards)Labour

    A report commissioned by the Ministry of Justice and published in 2023 found limited evidence of unaccredited child contact centres. Protocols make it clear that as part of family court proceedings, the judiciary and the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service should refer families only to centres accredited by the National Association of Child Contact Centres. There are, however, clearly issues with the sector, in terms of cost and accessibility, and we will always seek to improve it.

    View contribution permalink →

  3. Alison HumeLabour

    In cases where family court proceedings lead to child removal, parents can be forced to use unregulated contact centres—it can cost hundreds of pounds for just a few hours of contact—because of a lack of accessible, regulated contact centre provision. What assessment has the Minister made of the impact of this situation on the welfare of children and families, and will his Department initiate a review of current arrangements?

    View contribution permalink →

  4. Jake RichardsLabour

    I thank my hon. Friend for raising this important issue. Where it is safe to do so, we would always encourage parents to have contact with their children. The courts encourage this; it is always in the child’s best interests to have that contact. Where contact centres are necessary, they need to be close to home and, clearly, affordable. This sector is independent of Government, but if it is not working, as we are hearing from my hon. Friend, we will look into it in due course.

    View contribution permalink →

Source: UK Parliament Hansard API. Debate ID: 5408081.